## Core Position
The Bible as we have it — 66 books, 39 Old Testament and 27 New Testament — is the complete, closed, and sufficient written Word of God available to us. The canon was not created by the church; it was recognized by the church. The Deuterocanonical books (Apocrypha) are valuable historical literature but are not Scripture. No new writings are added to the canon.
Personal note from Pastor Charlie: 66 is an incomplete number. Whether there were other inspired writings that are now forever lost remains a mystery this side of eternity. The position is not that 66 is a mathematically perfect or final number by design — it is that the canon is complete based on what is available to us today. If there were others, they are gone. What we have is sufficient.
The Canon Was Recognized, Not Created
The authority of Scripture does not derive from the church's decision to include it. God-breathed writing carries its own authority (2 Timothy 3:16). The church's role was to recognize and affirm what was already authoritative — not to grant authority by institutional decree. A court that recognizes a law does not stand above the law.
Supporting Scripture
Revelation 22:18-19 — "If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book." The Word is closed against addition.
Jude 1:3 — "The faith that was once for all delivered to the saints." Once for all — the revelation is complete.
2 Timothy 3:16 — "All Scripture is breathed out by God." The canon is the complete scope of God-breathed writing available to us.
Matthew 5:17-18 — Jesus affirms the OT canon as authoritative and complete in its witness.
Luke 24:44 — Jesus references "the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms" — the three divisions of the Hebrew OT canon.
On the Apocrypha (Deuterocanonical Books)
The Deuterocanonical books were never part of the Hebrew canon recognized by Jewish tradition. Jesus and the NT authors quote the OT extensively — never once quoting the Apocrypha as Scripture. The early church debated their status; they appeared in the Septuagint but were not treated as canonical by Jewish tradition.
Jerome, who translated the Latin Vulgate, explicitly distinguished the Deuterocanonicals from canonical books. The Council of Trent (1546) officially added them to the Catholic canon — notably after the Reformation began, raising legitimate questions about whether the decision was partly polemical.
They contain valuable historical and literary material but are not God-breathed Scripture. Assessment: TRADITION on the Catholic side. INFERENCE on the Protestant side — based on the pattern of Jesus and the NT authors' quotation practice and the Hebrew canon's exclusion of these books.
On Lost or Referenced Writings — Honest Uncertainty
The Bible itself references writings that are not in the canon — the Book of Jasher (Joshua 10:13), the Book of the Wars of the Lord (Numbers 21:14), the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel and Judah (referenced throughout Kings and Chronicles). These writings existed. They are not in our canon. Whether they were inspired or simply historical records is unknown.
If God intended them to be part of His revealed Word, they would have been preserved. Their absence is not evidence of an incomplete revelation — it is evidence that God's providential preservation determined what we have. What we have is sufficient for faith and practice (2 Timothy 3:16-17). What we do not have remains in mystery.
What This Rejects
Catholic Deuterocanon as Scripture — never quoted as Scripture by Jesus or NT authors; excluded from Hebrew canon; added by Trent in 1546.
New revelation equal to Scripture — Jude 1:3 (once for all delivered); Revelation 22:18-19 (nothing added).
The church created the canon — the church recognized what was already God-breathed; institutional recognition does not grant authority.
The Book of Mormon / Quran as additional Scripture — Jude 1:3, Revelation 22:18-19, Galatians 1:8 — the revelation is complete and any addition is accursed.